000 04168nam a22004815i 4500
001 978-94-007-5137-8
003 DE-He213
005 20140220082936.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121205s2013 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789400751378
_9978-94-007-5137-8
024 7 _a10.1007/978-94-007-5137-8
_2doi
050 4 _aBC1-199
072 7 _aHPL
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI011000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a160
_223
100 1 _avan der Schaar, Maria.
_eeditor.
245 1 0 _aJudgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic
_h[electronic resource] /
_cedited by Maria van der Schaar.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2013.
300 _aXVII, 161 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aLogic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ;
_v31
505 0 _aPreface -- Part 1. Constructivism, Judgement, and Reason -- Chapter 1. Verificationism then and now: Per Martin-Löf -- Chapter 2. Demonstrations versus Proofs, being an afterword to 'Constructions, Proofs and the meaning of Logical Constants': Göran Sundholm -- Chapter 3. Containment and Variation: Two Strands in the Development of Analyticity from Aristotle to Martin-Löf: Göran Sundholm -- Part 2. Judgement and Reason in the Seventeenth Century -- Chapter 4. Decartes' Theory of Judgement: Warranted Assertions, the Key to Science: Elodie Cassan -- Chapter 5. Striving, Oomph, and Intelligibility in Spinoza: Michael Della Rocca -- Part 3. Kant, Neo-Kantianism, and Bolzano -- Chapter 6. The Role of Wolff's Analysis of Judgments in Kant's Inaugural Dissertation: Johan Blok -- Chapter 7. Windelband on 'Beurteilung’: Arnaud Dewalque -- Chapter 8. A Priori Knowledge in Bolzano; Conceptual Truths and Judgements: Stefan Roski -- Part 4. Husserl, Frege and Russell -- Chapter 9. Immanent and Real States of Affairs in Husserl's Early Theory of Judgement: Robin Rollinger -- Chapter 10. Frege and Russell on Assertion: Jeremy Kelly.
520 _aThis compelling reevaluation of the relationship between logic and knowledge affirms the key role that the notion of judgement must play in such a review. The commentary repatriates the concept of judgement in the discussion, banished in recent times by the logical positivism of Wittgenstein, Hilbert and Schlick, and the Platonism of Bolzano. The volume commences with the insights of Swedish philosopher Per Martin-Löf, the father of constructive type theory, for whom logic is a demonstrative science in which judgement is a settled feature of the landscape. His paper opens the first of four sections that examine, in turn, historical philosophical assessments of judgement and reason; their place in early modern philosophy; the notion of judgement and logical theory in Wolff, Kant and Neo-Kantians like Windelband; their development in the Husserlian phenomenological paradigm; and the work of Bolzano, Russell and Frege. The papers, whose authors include Per Martin-Löf, Göran Sundholm, Michael Della Rocca and Robin Rollinger, represent a finely judged editorial selection highlighting work on philosophers exercised by the question of whether or not an epistemic notion of judgement has a role to play in logic. The volume will be of profound interest to students and academicians for its application of historical developments in philosophy to the solution of vexatious contemporary issues in the foundation of logic.
650 0 _aPhilosophy (General).
650 0 _aChemistry.
650 0 _aGenetic epistemology.
650 0 _aLogic.
650 1 4 _aPhilosophy.
650 2 4 _aLogic.
650 2 4 _aEpistemology.
650 2 4 _aTheoretical and Computational Chemistry.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789400751361
830 0 _aLogic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ;
_v31
856 4 0 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5137-8
912 _aZDB-2-SHU
999 _c99544
_d99544