000			03483nam a22004935i 4500
001			978-94-007-4593-3
003			DE-He213
005			20140220082934.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			120914s2013 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9789400745933 _9978-94-007-4593-3
024	7		_a10.1007/978-94-007-4593-3 _2doi
050		4	_aK201-487
050		4	_aB65
050		4	_aK140-165
072		7	_aLAB _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW079000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aPHI021000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a340.1 _223
100	1		_aCanale, Damiano. _eeditor.
245	1	4	_aThe Planning Theory of Law _h[electronic resource] : _bA Critical Reading / _cedited by Damiano Canale, Giovanni Tuzet.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013.
300			_aXVII, 205 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aLaw and Philosophy Library, _x1572-4395 ; _v100
505	0		_a100th edition announcement -- Authors Biographies -- Introduction; Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet -- 1. Looking for the Nature of Law: On Shapiro’s Challenge; Damiano Canale -- 2. The Possibility Puzzle and Legal Positivism; Francesca Poggi -- 3. What is Wrong with Legal Realism?; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. Rule of Recognition, Convention and Obligation. What Shapiro Can Still Learn from Hart’s Mistakes; Aldo Schiavello -- 5. Legality: Between Purposes and Functions; Diego Papayannis -- 6. What Can Plans Do for Legal Theory?; Bruno Celano -- 7. Ruling Platitudes, Old Metaphysics, and a Few Misunderstandings about Legal Positivism.; Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 8. Theoretical Disagreements. A Restatement of Legal Positivism; Jordi Ferrer and Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 9. ‘What’s the Plan?’ On Interpretation and Meta-interpretation in Scott Shapiro’s Legality; Giorgio Pino.
520			_aThis collection of essays is the outcome of a workshop with Scott Shapiro on The Planning Theory of Law that took place in December 2009 at Bocconi University. It brings together a group of scholars who wrote their contributions to the workshop on a preliminary draft of Shapiro’s Legality. Then, after the workshop, they wrote their final essays on the published version of the book. The contributions clearly highlight the difference of the continental and civil law perspective from the common law background of Shapiro but at the same time the volume tries to bridge the gap between the two. The essays provide a critical reading of the planning theory of law, highlighting its merits on the one hand and objecting to some parts of it on the other hand. Each contribution discusses in detail a chapter of Shapiro’s book and together they cover the whole of Shapiro’s theory. So the book presents a balanced and insightful discussion of the arguments of Legality.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aPhilosophy of law.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650	2	4	_aPhilosophy of Law.
700	1		_aTuzet, Giovanni. _eeditor.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9789400745926
830		0	_aLaw and Philosophy Library, _x1572-4395 ; _v100
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4593-3
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
999			_c99435 _d99435