000			03450nam a22004695i 4500
001			978-1-4614-6504-1
003			DE-He213
005			20140220082825.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			130517s2013 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781461465041 _9978-1-4614-6504-1
024	7		_a10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1 _2doi
050		4	_aRC434.2-574
072		7	_aMMH _2bicssc
072		7	_aMED105000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a616.89 _223
100	1		_aParis, Joel. _eeditor.
245	1	0	_aMaking the DSM-5 _h[electronic resource] : _bConcepts and Controversies / _cedited by Joel Paris, James Phillips.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bSpringer New York : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013.
300			_aIX, 180 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aThe History of DSM -- Considering the Economy of DSM Alternatives -- The Ideology behind DSM-5 -- The Biopolitics of Defining “Mental Disorder” -- Establishing Normative Validity for Scientific Psychiatric Nosology: The Significance of Integrating Patient Perspectives -- The Paradox of Professional Success: Grand Ambition, Furious Resistance, and the Derailment of the DSM-5 Revision -- DSM in Philosophyland: Curiouser and Curiouser -- Overdiagnosis, Underdiagnosis, Synthesis: A Dialectic for Psychiatry and the DSM -- What does Phenomenology Contribute to the Debate about DSM-5 -- The Conceptual Status of DSM-5 Diagnoses -- Conclusion.
520			_aIn 2013, the American Psychiatric Association published the 5th edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Often referred to as the “bible” of psychiatry, the manual only classifies mental disorders and does not explain them or guide their treatment. While science should be the basis of any diagnostic system, to date, there is no knowledge on whether most conditions listed in the manual are true diseases. Moreover, in DSM-5 the overall definition of mental disorder is weak, failing to distinguish psychopathology from normality. In spite of all the progress that has been made in neuroscience over the last few decades, the psychiatric community is no closer to understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of mental disorders than it was fifty years ago.   In Making the DSM-5, prominent experts delve into the debate about psychiatric nosology and examine the conceptual and pragmatic issues underlying the new manual. While retracing the historic controversy over DSM, considering the political context and economic impact of the manual, and focusing on what was revised or left unchanged in the new edition, this timely volume addresses the main concerns of the future of psychiatry and questions whether the DSM legacy can truly improve the specialty and advance its goals.
650		0	_aMedicine.
650		0	_aPsychiatry.
650		0	_aPsychopharmacology.
650		0	_aBehavioral Therapy.
650	1	4	_aMedicine & Public Health.
650	2	4	_aPsychiatry.
650	2	4	_aPsychopharmacology.
650	2	4	_aBehavioral Therapy.
700	1		_aPhillips, James. _eeditor.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781461465034
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1
912			_aZDB-2-SME
999			_c95686 _d95686