| 000 | 03248nam a22004455i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 978-3-658-04438-1 | ||
| 003 | DE-He213 | ||
| 005 | 20140220082523.0 | ||
| 007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
| 008 | 131128s2014 gw | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9783658044381 _9978-3-658-04438-1 |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-3-658-04438-1 _2doi |
|
| 050 | 4 | _aJA1-92 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPA _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL000000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a320 _223 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aKaßner, Malte. _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe Influence of the Type of Dominant Party on Democracy _h[electronic resource] : _bA Comparison Between South Africa and Malaysia / _cby Malte Kaßner. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aWiesbaden : _bSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : _bImprint: Springer VS, _c2014. |
|
| 300 |
_aXXII, 362 p. 2 illus. _bonline resource. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 1 | _aPolitik in Afrika, Asien und Lateinamerika, Politikwissenschaftliche Analysen zur Entwicklungs- und Schwellenländerforschung | |
| 505 | 0 | _aDifferent types of dominant parties -- Organization of dominant parties -- Character and impacts of ideological concepts -- Behavioural norms of dominant parties -- Effects on the type of democracy. | |
| 520 | _aDominant parties and democracies – are they really strange bedfellows? Malte Kaßner sheds light on the relation between one-party dominance and democracy from a comparative perspective. The study examines the key question how different types of dominant parties influence democracy in multicultural societies with the help of two case studies: South Africa and Malaysia. Both countries are characterized by an ethnically, linguistically and religiously plural society. The author analyses the two dominant parties African National Congress (ANC) and United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and their implications on democracy in the two countries. The outcome suggests that one-party dominance per se cannot be assessed as beneficial or harmful for democratic development. Rather, dominant parties deserve a stronger analytical differentiation. Causal patterns contribute to such a differentiation. Contents Different types of dominant parties Organization of dominant parties Character and impacts of ideological concepts Behavioural norms of dominant parties Effects on the type of democracy Target groups Researchers and students in political science Strategists of political parties Political analysts and commentators Author Malte Kaßner is freelance coach and consultant for development co-operations worldwide. | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aSocial sciences. | |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aSocial Sciences. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPolitical Science, general. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aComparative Politics. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aInternational Relations. |
| 710 | 2 | _aSpringerLink (Online service) | |
| 773 | 0 | _tSpringer eBooks | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783658044374 |
| 830 | 0 | _aPolitik in Afrika, Asien und Lateinamerika, Politikwissenschaftliche Analysen zur Entwicklungs- und Schwellenländerforschung | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04438-1 |
| 912 | _aZDB-2-CMS | ||
| 999 |
_c93615 _d93615 |
||