000			03498nam a22004935i 4500
001			978-3-642-40267-8
003			DE-He213
005			20140220082520.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			130930s2014 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783642402678 _9978-3-642-40267-8
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-642-40267-8 _2doi
050		4	_aKJ-KKZ4999
072		7	_aLB _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a341.2422 _223
100	1		_aVelluti, Samantha. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aReforming the Common European Asylum System — Legislative developments and judicial activism of the European Courts _h[electronic resource] / _cby Samantha Velluti.
264		1	_aBerlin, Heidelberg : _bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg : _bImprint: Springer, _c2014.
300			_aXI, 110 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aSpringerBriefs in Law, _x2192-855X
505	0		_aIntroduction -- The road to the Common European Asylum system: from Amsterdam to Lisbon and beyond -- Recasting of asylum legislation: Nolumus leges mutari -- The Role of the European Courts in ensuring adequate standards of asylum-seekers’ human rights’ protection in Europe after Lisbon -- CEAS, asylum-seekers and EU human rights post-Lisbon: closing the gaps in the European protection regime.
520			_aIn June 2013, after lengthy and complex negotiations the EU adopted the recast “asylum package” which represents a significant step forward in the future development of CEAS. In this timely study Velluti provides fresh insights into recent legislative and judicial developments in asylum and through the “lens” of sovereignty she looks at some of the contemporary challenges faced by the EU protection regime, with a particular focus on asylum-seekers’ rights. The volume assesses whether the EU provides an adequate framework for protecting those seeking international protection from the opposing perspectives of effectiveness and fairness. It shows that, despite the newly adopted “second-generation” legislative acts which include changes aimed at ensuring a stronger level of protection for asylum-seekers, the reform process at European level does not adequately ensure an equal standard of protection across all Member States. Through a comparative analysis of selected ECtHR and ECJ asylum cases the book also examines the constitutional relationship between the two European Courts and how it impacts on the human rights of asylum-seekers and on the future of EU asylum law.   Ultimately, the book shows that real progress in the development of the human rights dimension of CEAS will be achieved largely through the European and domestic courts.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aMigration.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aEuropean Law.
650	2	4	_aHuman Rights.
650	2	4	_aMigration.
650	2	4	_aPublic International Law.
650	2	4	_aInternational Humanitarian Law, Law of Armed Conflict.
650	2	4	_aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783642402661
830		0	_aSpringerBriefs in Law, _x2192-855X
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40267-8
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
999			_c93406 _d93406