000 05890cam a22005298i 4500
001 9781003002239
003 FlBoTFG
005 20220509193132.0
006 m d | |
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200416s2020 nyu ob 001 0 eng
040 _aOCoLC-P
_beng
_erda
_cOCoLC-P
020 _a9781003002239
_q(ebook)
020 _a1003002234
_q(ebook)
020 _a9781000066944
_q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020 _a1000066940
_q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020 _a9781000066937
_q(electronic bk. : PDF)
020 _a1000066932
_q(electronic bk. : PDF)
020 _a9781000066951
_q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020 _a1000066959
_q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020 _z9780367430818
_q(hardback)
035 _a(OCoLC)1151503777
035 _a(OCoLC-P)1151503777
050 0 0 _aR724
072 7 _aPHI
_x005000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aMED
_x050000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aHPQ
_2bicssc
082 0 0 _a610.69/5
_223
100 1 _aCard, Robert F.,
_eauthor.
245 1 2 _aA new theory of conscientious objection in medicine :
_bjustification and reasonability /
_cRobert F. Card.
264 1 _aNew York :
_bRoutledge,
_c[2020]
300 _a1 online resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aRoutledge annals of bioethics ;
_v21
505 0 _aChapter 1. The Main Considerations -- 1 Introduction -- 2 What Matters: A Thought Experiment in the Real World -- 3 Setting the Stage: What are Conscience Objections? -- 4 Conscience, Conscientious Objection versus Civil Disobedience, and the Problem of Toleration and Public Reason -- 5 Reasons, Reason-Giving, and the Reasonability View -- 6 Introduction to Professional Responsibility -- 7 Moral Complicity -- Chapter 2. The Inescapability of Reasons-Assessment -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Philosophical Views: Genuineness View -- 3 Matching View -- 4 Incompatibility View -- 5 Referral View -- 6 The Reasonability View and the Inescapability of Reasons-Assessment -- 7 Some Possible Responses -- 8 Is Assessing Reasons Really Necessary? -- 9 Reasons Not to Ask for Reasons: Is Assessing Providers' Reasons Intolerant? -- 10 Conclusion -- Chapter 3. Developing the Reasonability View -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Individual and Social Nature of Justificatory Reasons -- 3 Reasonability in Medicine and its Application to Some Core Cases -- Chapter 4. Further Developing the Reasonability View -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Objections to the Reasonability Standard -- 3 The Reasonability View and Conscientious Objection by Medical Students -- 4 The Reasonability View and Institutional Conscience -- Chapter 5. From Objections to Exemptions: Establishing Conscientious Objector Status in Medicine -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background on Military CO Status -- 3 Military and Medical CO: Why the Existence of One Does Not Necessarily Support -- the Other -- 4 The Medical Conscientious Objector Board and the Duties of Providers Granted CO Status -- 5 Why is Establishing CO Status in Medicine an Attractive Policy Proposal? -- 6 Is Establishing CO Status in Medicine Using a Reasonability Standard Workable? Is it an Impractical Policy? -- 7 Is Utilizing CO Status as a Policy Irreparably Politically Tainted? Does this Policy Violate Rights? -- 8 Does a Policy of Medical CO Status Establish a Positive Obligation to Provide Contested Services to Patients? -- Chapter 6. Alternative Views, Objections, and Replies -- 1 The Incompatibility View v2.0 -- 2 The Market View: Should We Allow Discriminatory Conscientious Objection? -- 3 Integrity, the All-or-Nothing Problem, and the Moral Status of Medical Practices -- 4 How Much Should Reasons Matter if We Value Toleration? -- 5 Concluding Note.
520 _a"This book argues that a conscientiously objecting medical professional should receive an exemption only if the grounds of an objector's refusal are reasonable. It defends a detailed, contextual account of public reasonability suited for healthcare, which builds from the overarching concept of Rawlsian public reason. The author analyzes the main competing positions and maintains that these other views fail precisely due to their systematic inattention to the grounding reasons behind a conscientious objection; he argues that any such view is plausible to the extent that it mimics the 'reason-giving requirement' for conscience objections defended in this work. Only reasonable objections can defeat the prior professional obligation to assign primacy to patient well-being, therefore one who refuses a patient's request for a legally available, medically indicated, and safe service must be able to explain the grounds of their objection in terms understandable to other citizens within the public institutional structure of medicine. The book further offers a novel policy proposal to deploy the Reasonability View: establishing conscientious objector status in medicine. It concludes that the Reasonability View is a viable and attractive position in this debate. A New Theory of Conscientious Objection in Medicine: Justification and Reasonability will be of interest to researchers and advanced students working in bioethics, medical ethics, and philosophy of medicine, as well as thinkers interested in the intersections between law, medical humanities, and philosophy"--
_cProvided by publisher.
588 _aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650 0 _aConscientious objection.
650 0 _aPhysicians
_xProfessional ethics.
650 0 _aMedical ethics.
650 0 _aMedicine
_xPhilosophy.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aMEDICAL / Ethics
_2bisacsh
856 4 0 _3Taylor & Francis
_uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003002239
856 4 2 _3OCLC metadata license agreement
_uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
999 _c130607
_d130607