000			03986cam a22005058i 4500
001			9781351202510
003			FlBoTFG
005			20220509192941.0
006			m o d
007			cr |||||||||||
008			190126s2019 nyu o 000 0 eng
040			_aOCoLC-P _beng _erda _cOCoLC-P
020			_a9781351202510 _q(e-book)
020			_a1351202510
020			_a9781351202497 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a1351202499 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a9781351202480 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020			_a1351202480 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020			_a9781351202503 _q(electronic bk. : PDF)
020			_a1351202502 _q(electronic bk. : PDF)
020			_z9780815385059 (hardback)
035			_a(OCoLC)1083705361
035			_a(OCoLC-P)1083705361
050	1	0	_aNA7238.L6
072		7	_aARC _x008000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aARC _x010000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aRGL _2bicssc
082	0	0	_a728.09794/94 _223
100	1		_aFalletta, Liz, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aBy-right, by-design : _bhousing development versus housing design in Los Angeles / _cLiz Falletta.
264		1	_aNew York : _bRoutledge, _c2019.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bn _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aRoutledge research in planning and urban design
520			_aHousing is an essential, but complex, product, so complex that professionals involved in its production, namely, architects, real estate developers and urban planners, have difficulty agreeing on good housing outcomes. Less-than-optimal solutions that have resulted from a too narrow focus on one discipline over others are familiar: high design that is costly to build that makes little contribution to the public realm, highly profitable but seemingly identical cookie-cutter dwellings with no sense of place and well-planned neighborhoods full of generically designed, unmarketable product types. Differing roles, languages and criteria for success shape these perspectives, which, in turn, influence attitudes about housing regulation. Real estate developers, for example, prefer projects that can be built as-of-right or by-right, meaning that they can be approved quickly because they meet all current planning, zoning and building code requirements. Design-focused projects, heretofore by-design, by contrast, often require time to challenge existing regulatory codes, pursuing discretionary modifications meant to maximize design innovation and development potential. Meanwhile, urban planners work to establish and mediate the threshold between by-right and by-design processes by setting housing standards and determining appropriate housing policy. But just what is the right line between by-right and by-design? By-Right, By-Design provides a historical perspective, conceptual frameworks and practical strategies that cross and connect the diverse professions involved in housing production. The heart of the book is a set of six cross-disciplinary comparative case studies, each examining a significant Los Angeles housing design precedent approved by-variance and its associated development type approved as of right. Each comparison tells a different story about the often-hidden relationships among the three primary disciplines shaping the built environment, some of which uphold, and others of which transgress, conventional disciplinary stereotypes.
588			_aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650		0	_aArchitecture, Domestic _zCalifornia _zLos Angeles.
650		0	_aHousing development _zCalifornia _zLos Angeles.
650		0	_aArchitecture and society _zCalifornia _zLos Angeles.
650		7	_aARCHITECTURE / Landscape _2bisacsh
650		7	_aARCHITECTURE / Urban & Land Use Planning _2bisacsh
856	4	0	_3Taylor & Francis _uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351202510
856	4	2	_3OCLC metadata license agreement _uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
999			_c127120 _d127120