| 000 | 02980nam a22005175i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 978-90-481-2788-7 | ||
| 003 | DE-He213 | ||
| 005 | 20140220084556.0 | ||
| 007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
| 008 | 100301s2010 ne | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9789048127887 _9978-90-481-2788-7 |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-90-481-2788-7 _2doi |
|
| 050 | 4 | _aD1-DX301 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aPDX _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aSCI034000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a509 _223 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aJones, Alexander. _eeditor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPtolemy in Perspective _h[electronic resource] : _bUse and Criticism of his Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century / _cedited by Alexander Jones. |
| 250 | _a1. | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2010. |
|
| 300 | _bonline resource. | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aArchimedes, New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, _x1385-0180 ; _v23 |
|
| 505 | 0 | _aAn Unpublished Astronomical Papyrus Contemporary with Ptolemy -- Ancient Rejection and Adoption of Ptolemy’s Frame of Reference for Longitudes -- Ptolemy’s Doctrine of the Terms and Its Reception -- The Tradition of Texts and Maps in Ptolemy’s Geography -- Islamic Reactions to Ptolemy’s Imprecisions -- The Use and Abuse of Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos in Renaissance and Early Modern Europe: Two Case Studies (Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Filippo Fantoni) -- Tycho, Longomontanus, and Kepler on Ptolemy’s Solar Observations and Theory, Precession of the Equinoxes, and Obliquity of the Ecliptic -- Dunthorne, Mayer, and Lalande on the Secular Acceleration of the Moon. | |
| 520 | _aPtolemy was the most important physical scientist of the Roman Empire, and for a millennium and a half his writings on astronomy, astrology, and geography were models for imitation, resources for new work, and targets of criticism. Ptolemy in Perspective traces reactions to Ptolemy from his own times to ours. The nine studies show the complex processes by which an ancient scientist and his work gained and subsequently lost an overreaching reputation and authority. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aScience _xHistory. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aGeographical information systems. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aHumanities. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aHistory. | |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aScience, general. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHistory of Science. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aAstronomy, Observations and Techniques. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aClassical Studies. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aGeographical Information Systems/Cartography. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHistory. |
| 710 | 2 | _aSpringerLink (Online service) | |
| 773 | 0 | _tSpringer eBooks | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9789048127870 |
| 830 | 0 |
_aArchimedes, New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, _x1385-0180 ; _v23 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2788-7 |
| 912 | _aZDB-2-SHU | ||
| 999 |
_c113220 _d113220 |
||