000 03268nam a22005415i 4500
001 978-94-007-1761-9
003 DE-He213
005 20140220083835.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 110729s2011 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789400717619
_9978-94-007-1761-9
024 7 _a10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9
_2doi
050 4 _aP1-1091
072 7 _aCBX
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAN009000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aFOR000000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a410
_223
100 1 _aBermejo Luque, Lilian.
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aGiving Reasons
_h[electronic resource] :
_bA Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory /
_cby Lilian Bermejo Luque.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2011.
300 _aXVI, 209 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aArgumentation Library,
_x1566-7650 ;
_v20
505 0 _aPreface -- I Argumentation and Its Study -- II Why Do We Need a New Theory of Argumentation? -- III Acts of Arguing -- IV The Logical Dimension of Argumentation -- V The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation -- VI The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation -- VII Argumentation Appraisal -- References.
520 _aThis book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments. This theory sheds light on the many faces of argumentative communication: verbal and non-verbal, monological and dialogical, literal and non-literal, ordinary and specialized. The book takes into consideration the major current comprehensive accounts of good argumentation (Perelman’s New Rhetoric, Pragma-dialectics, the ARG model, the Epistemic Approach) and shows that these accounts have fundamental weaknesses rooted in their instrumentalist conception of argumentation as an activity oriented to a goal external to itself. Furthermore, the author addresses some challenging meta-theoretical questions such as the justification problem for Argumentation Theory models and the relationship between reasoning and arguing.
650 0 _aLinguistics.
650 0 _aGenetic epistemology.
650 0 _aLogic.
650 0 _aLinguistics
_xPhilosophy.
650 0 _aLaw
_xPhilosophy.
650 1 4 _aLinguistics.
650 2 4 _aLinguistics (general).
650 2 4 _aLogic.
650 2 4 _aEpistemology.
650 2 4 _aLaw Theory/Law Philosophy.
650 2 4 _aLearning & Instruction.
650 2 4 _aPhilosophy of Language.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789400717602
830 0 _aArgumentation Library,
_x1566-7650 ;
_v20
856 4 0 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9
912 _aZDB-2-SHU
999 _c109565
_d109565