000			03172nam a22004455i 4500
001			978-90-6704-743-2
003			DE-He213
005			20140220083827.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			110904s2011 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9789067047432 _9978-90-6704-743-2
024	7		_a10.1007/978-90-6704-743-2 _2doi
050		4	_aK7000-7720.22
050		4	_aK7073-7078
072		7	_aLB _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAM _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aLAW016000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a340.9 _223
082	0	4	_a340.2 _223
100	1		_aBaarsma, N. A. _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe Europeanisation of International Family Law _h[electronic resource] / _cby N. A. Baarsma.
264		1	_aThe Hague, The Netherlands : _bT. M. C. Asser Press, _c2011.
300			_aXV, 341p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aIntroduction -- The Dutch choice of law rules on divorce -- The Dutch choice of law rules on the termination of registered partnerships -- The Europeanisation of international family law: the EU legislature’s competence -- The proposed European choice of law rules on divorce -- The failure of the establishment of a common European choice of law on divorce -- The Dutch and the European choice of law rules on divorce compared -- A unified system of international family law in the European Union: which way forward?.
520			_aInternational family law is an area that is predominantly regulated by national law. Currently the national choice of law rules of the EU Member States are more and more displaced by common European rules, which will entail considerable changes. In this book, the nature and reasons of the changes brought about by the transition from a national to a supranational choice of law approach are discussed in one particular field of international family law: the termination by dissolution of marriages and marriage-like registered partnerships. The current Dutch and the proposed European choice of law rules on divorce are examined and compared. Some Member States have strongly opposed the European proposal and no consensus could be reached. The analysis of the failure of the European proposal shows that the most important bottleneck is the lack of a theoretical foundation of the unified choice of law. In the concluding chapter the author produces a number of recommendations on the development of (a theoretical foundation of) the European system of international family law, starting from the principles and objectives of European law.   Nynke Baarsma is presently working in the District Court of Groningen, The Netherlands.
650		0	_aLaw.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9789067047425
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-743-2
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
999			_c109152 _d109152