000			02258nam a22004575i 4500
001			978-3-642-17351-6
003			DE-He213
005			20140220083750.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			110223s2011 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783642173516 _9978-3-642-17351-6
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-642-17351-6 _2doi
050		4	_aK5000-5582
072		7	_aLNF _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW026000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a345 _223
100	1		_aSevdiren, Öznur. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aAlternatives to Imprisonment in England and Wales, Germany and Turkey _h[electronic resource] : _bA Comparative Study / _cby Öznur Sevdiren.
264		1	_aBerlin, Heidelberg : _bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg, _c2011.
300			_aXV, 282p. 17 illus. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_a1 Introduction -- 2 Some Reflections on the History and Development of Alternatives to Prison -- 3 Alternatives to Imprisonment in England: Destined to Fall? -- 4 Alternatives to Imprisonment in Germany: Less is More?.- 5 Alternatives to Imprisonment in Turkey: A "Schattendasein"?.- 6 Summary and Conclusions -- References.
520			_aThe book focuses on one of the most problematic areas of Turkish penal justice: the overreliance on custodial measures and a corresponding growth in the prison population, and compares Turkey with two major European countries in this respect: England and Wales and Germany. The underlying question throughout the study is the extent to which prison alternatives can be seen as genuine alternatives to immediate custodial sentences.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aCriminal Law.
650		0	_aComparative law.
650		0	_aCriminology.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aCriminal Law.
650	2	4	_aInternational & Foreign Law/Comparative Law.
650	2	4	_aCriminology & Criminal Justice.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783642173509
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17351-6
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
999			_c107240 _d107240