000 02001nam a22004215i 4500
001 978-94-007-2088-6
003 DE-He213
005 20140220083339.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 110924s2012 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789400720886
_9978-94-007-2088-6
024 7 _a10.1007/978-94-007-2088-6
_2doi
050 4 _aS1-S972
072 7 _aTVB
_2bicssc
072 7 _aTEC003000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a630
_223
100 1 _aZimdahl, Robert L.
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aWeed Science - A Plea for Thought - Revisited
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby Robert L. Zimdahl.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2012.
300 _aXII, 73p. 1 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aSpringerBriefs in Agriculture,
_x2211-808X
520 _aWeed scientists are confident of increasing production through agricultural technology, including herbicides, but do not must ask if the moral obligation to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that leads to appropriate change is advocated. Weed scientists have a research consensus - a paradigm - Weeds must be controlled. Herbicides are the best control technology. Agriculture's practitoners should discuss the necessity and risks of their technology. Discussion must include scientific evidence and value-laden arguments.
650 0 _aLife sciences.
650 0 _aAgriculture.
650 1 4 _aLife Sciences.
650 2 4 _aAgriculture.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789400720879
830 0 _aSpringerBriefs in Agriculture,
_x2211-808X
856 4 0 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2088-6
912 _aZDB-2-SBL
999 _c104379
_d104379